Candidate 1
How repeatable is the process?
How clear are the rules / SOP?
How many exceptions occur?
How much human judgment is required?
Are the inputs/data accessible?
Is there a clear process owner?
Free AI automation tool
Find the workflow worth automating first.
Compare up to three repetitive processes. The scorecard separates business value from automation readiness so you do not waste time automating the easiest thing instead of the right thing.
No signupRuns in your browserTransparent scoring
01Measure the pain.Frequency, time, labor value, error cost.
02Measure the readiness.Rules, exceptions, judgment, data, ownership.
03Prioritize the pilot.Start where impact and feasibility overlap.
Automation opportunity scorecard
Compare three candidate workflows.
Candidate 1
Candidate 2
Candidate 3
Your ranking
Where to start.
Priority combines business impact and automation readiness. It is a planning score, not a guarantee of technical feasibility or financial return.
How the score works
High pain is not enough. Easy automation is not enough.
The tool intentionally scores two separate questions:
ImpactHow much labor, frequency, and error/delay cost is tied up in the workflow?
ReadinessIs the process repeatable, clear, low-exception, low-judgment, data-ready, and owned?
Priority score = 55% normalized impact + 45% readiness. Readiness is capped if the process has no clear rules or relies heavily on expert judgment. That prevents a high-cost but chaotic process from automatically appearing to be the best first automation.